With the millions and millions of P2P users around the world, how safe from being singled out is the, let's say, "average" P2P community member who "accidentally" shares what could be perceived as an unauthorized, copyrighted file.let's say for the sake of argument here, it's a video or even an audio file and perhaps he/she does this a couple/few times a week only? "As such, some people never see the emails meant for them." Personally, I think BISS is working with antip2p companies, not against them. If the lists are crap, so are the results from it, and the lists ARE crap. If you take their level1 list, and replace 'mediadefender' with 'God', has peerguardian now proved the christians right? No, the program just shows what the lists have down. Whats really happening is the program displays the lable in the list, that goes with the IP. People also see what's being blocked and think that that company is trying to connect. It's absurd what they use to justify a list. Popcap is owned by a company, and the parent company of that, has a share in mediasentry.
#PEERGUARDIAN UPDATES UTORRENT#
has made distribution deals with some US studios and production companies.ģ) those studios and/or production companies are members of the MPAAįrom that, bluetack deduce that is run by the MPAA, and that utorrent is spying on you. Why? well, that means following their chain of reasoning.Ģ) bittorrent inc. This whole website you're on now, is blocked by bluetack's level1 list. I spoke to one of the founders of PeerGuardian the other week. I've found that entries are often made up, associations claimed are not true, and that from tests of known IP ranges (what few there are) others have found hit rates significantly poorer than if they were entered at random. Ok, I've been doing some of the investigating on this for the past few years, but I'm not the only one.
0 kommentar(er)
